Tag Archives: santa maria deck inspection la canada flintridge deck inspection

The Balcony Inspection Transparency Project is Coming!

We document. We disclose. You decide.

Is the HOA industry ready to demand transparency? We are!


Introducing the Balcony Inspection Transparency Project

http://www.balconytransparency.org (coming soon)


William Leys Waterproofing Consultants LLC is a founding member—and we are inviting other California inspection companies to participate.


California homeowners associations, apartment owners, community managers, and building owners are being asked to make important decisions about balcony and exterior elevated element inspections. Those decisions can affect occupant safety, association finances, reserve planning, repair priorities, and long-term property maintenance.


Consumers deserve to know exactly who they are hiring.


That is why William Leys Waterproofing Consultants LLC is a founding member of the Balcony Inspection Transparency Project, or BITP.


BITP is being developed as a source-based consumer-information project focused on companies offering balcony, deck, and exterior elevated element inspection services in California. Its purpose is straightforward: make important information about inspection providers easier to find, understand, compare, and correct.

I don’t want to do this just on my own, so if you would like to volunteer as a participant to ensure a fair and even process across the board, feel free to let me know!


We document. We disclose. You decide.


We Are Seeking Cooperation Across the Industry
BITP should not be a directory in which one company gets to ask questions of everyone else while avoiding those same questions itself.
William Leys Waterproofing Consultants LLC intends to complete the same transparency questionnaire offered to every participating company. We will identify our company’s ownership, services, professional relationships, role in SB 326 projects, relevant licenses and qualifications, business affiliations, and whether we or another participant may have a financial interest in related services.


We are inviting balcony inspection companies, engineering firms, architectural firms, contractors, consultants, and other businesses offering exterior elevated element inspection services to participate voluntarily and without charge.


Participating companies will have an opportunity to:
Describe their company and inspection process in their own words;


Identify who performs field inspections;


Explain who prepares, reviews, signs, or seals the final report;


List applicable California professional and contractor licenses;


Explain certifications and professional designations they advertise;


Disclose relationships with credentialing organizations, training companies, associations, engineering firms, contractors, and repair providers;


Describe insurance and conflict-of-interest practices;


Provide supporting records and links; and
Correct, clarify, or update information appearing in their profile.


Download the Fillable BITP Company Questionnaire


Submit a Company Profile Online


What Consumers Should Be Able to Learn


A company profile should answer more than, “Does this business advertise balcony inspections?”


Consumers should be able to determine:


Who is actually performing the fieldwork?


Who exercises the professional judgment required by the applicable law?


Who is responsible for the final report?


What California licenses do those people hold?


Is an advertised certification governmental, private, association-issued, manufacturer-issued, or simply evidence of completing a training course?


Who created and controls the organization issuing that certification?


Does the inspection company—or a related business—perform repairs arising from its findings?


Are referral fees, commissions, reciprocal referrals, or other financial relationships involved?


Are important advertising claims supported by current, identifiable sources?


These questions do not assume that a particular business arrangement is improper. Inspection companies can be structured in many legitimate ways. Engineers, architects, contractors, consultants, technicians, and specialty firms can each have appropriate roles depending on the property, applicable statute, agreement, supervision, and scope of services.


The important point is that the consumer should not have to guess what those roles and relationships are.


Participation Is Not Certification or Endorsement


BITP will not call participating companies “BITP Certified.” Participation will not mean that BITP has approved, recommended, ranked, accredited, or guaranteed a company’s work.


A participating company will be identified as having supplied standardized information. Individual fields may be labeled:


Company supplied;


Company representation;


Corroborated by identified source;


Not independently reviewed;


Not disclosed; or


Disputed information.


Profiles may be published after private administrative review even when every factual field has not yet been independently corroborated. Unreviewed information will be labeled accordingly. That distinction allows companies to participate promptly without causing consumers to mistake company-supplied information for government verification or BITP endorsement.


What If a Company Does Not Participate?


Participation is voluntary. A company’s decision not to complete the questionnaire does not prove that the company has done anything wrong.
BITP may nevertheless create a Public-Information Profile using identified sources such as government licensing databases, Secretary of State records, company websites, archived webpages, published advertising, organizational records, and other material that can reasonably be authenticated.


Those profiles will be conspicuously labeled:


Public-Information Profile


This profile was compiled from the identified public sources. No completed, authorized company questionnaire has been incorporated as of the date shown.


Companies will be encouraged to respond, submit corrections, provide additional context, or complete the full questionnaire.


Why Hesitation Deserves Closer Attention


Balcony and exterior elevated element inspections can involve life-safety concerns and significant financial consequences. A credible provider should be prepared to answer reasonable questions about identity, qualifications, responsibility, and financial relationships.


If a company is hesitant or unwilling to identify who performs the inspection, who signs the report, what license the responsible professional holds, who issues an advertised certification, or whether affiliated businesses may profit from resulting work, a prospective client should pause and investigate further before signing a contract.


That hesitation is not proof of illegality, incompetence, dishonesty, or an improper conflict. There may be a reasonable explanation. But unanswered questions involving professional responsibility and financial interests are relevant warning signs. Consumers should request written clarification, verify public records, compare other providers, and decide whether they are comfortable proceeding.


Transparency does not require every company to use the same business model. It requires the company to describe its model accurately.


Why We Believe Transparency Improves the Industry


Clear disclosure rewards companies that are willing to identify the people performing the work, explain credentials accurately, disclose affiliations, and distinguish inspection services from repair opportunities.


It also helps consumers compare proposals on something more meaningful than price alone.
An HOA board should be able to compare:


The actual inspection scope;


The qualifications and role of each participant;


The applicable sampling approach;


The person responsible for professional findings;


The report and follow-up services included;


Potential additional charges;


Credential and association relationships; and
Any financial interest in subsequent testing, design, construction, or repair work.


When those facts are clear, responsible providers compete based on documented qualifications, defined scope, professional accountability, and the value they provide.


BITP Will Accept Corrections, Responses, and Consumer Evidence


The Project is also being designed to accept documented corrections, company responses, and private consumer-experience submissions.
Consumer submissions will not appear automatically as anonymous reviews or star ratings. BITP may privately verify the submitter, examine supporting documents, redact personal information, seek a company response, and distinguish between firsthand experience, company statements, public records, and BITP analysis.


The goal is not to create a complaint wall. The goal is to build a useful, fair, and correctable information resource.


Our Own Interest Will Be Disclosed


BITP is founded and published by William Leys and William Leys Waterproofing Consultants LLC. WLWC operates in the waterproofing consulting and balcony inspection-related industry. We therefore have a commercial and professional interest in the subject matter.


We will disclose that interest rather than describe BITP as an independent review website. When BITP discusses a person or company with whom the publisher has had a material business, regulatory, legal, or competitive relationship, that relationship should be specifically disclosed on the relevant page.


The credibility of the Project must come from consistent questions, identified sources, fair attribution, meaningful responses, visible corrections, and standards applied to WLWC as well as everyone else.


An Open Invitation to California Inspection Providers


If your company provides SB 326, SB 721, balcony, deck, waterproofing, or exterior elevated element inspection services in California, we invite you to become part of the Balcony Inspection Transparency Project.
Participation is free.


Tell consumers who you are. Identify the people responsible for your work. Explain your credentials. Disclose relevant affiliations. Provide sources that allow important information to be checked. If something in a profile is incomplete or wrong, help us correct it.
We are not asking other companies to disclose information that we are unwilling to disclose ourselves.


Download the Fillable Questionnaire (Coming soon)


Learn More About the Balcony Inspection Transparency Project


Publisher disclosure: The Balcony Inspection Transparency Project is founded and published by William Leys and William Leys Waterproofing Consultants LLC, which provides waterproofing consulting and balcony inspection-related services in California. Participation in BITP does not constitute certification, approval, ranking, recommendation, or endorsement.


William Leys Waterproofing Consultants LLC
805-801-2380
wleyswaterproofingconsultants.com

There’s No Word More Dangerous To Your Reserve Account Than “Free”

Accurate?

For an HOA’s reserve accounts there is no word that could be possibly any more dangerous than the word free. Board members hear that word and everything else becomes a dull roar.

“Well they said they were going to do a free inspection if we contracted for the work and we know we have work to do anyway so we may as well kill two birds with one stone.” Well not an actual quote but close enough to what I’ve been told a couple times. My response has been simply there is no such thing as free.

First question is are they inspecting with a structural engineer or an architect on stage 1? If not then the report is not valid if it’s robo stamped.

Second question Is aren’t you supposed to get three bids for the repairs? Why are you not following the CC&Rs that require three bids on any capital expenditures?

Last question is do you really think that you were getting the best price on the repair work? Reality is is they have found an easy mark and are ready to separate your HOA from its money.

Don’t fall for free. You get exactly what you pay for. The experts at William Leys Waterproofing Consultants LLC Do not give away their services for free but we also don’t contract for any work. We work in the association’s best interests and ensure that your money is spent well on repairs that are necessary. With our no conflict of interest guarantee you know that we are working for you and will advise you to the best of our ability with the knowledge that we have so that you can make the best decisions for your association.

Call us today at 805-801-2380 or go to the contact box to the left and send us a message.

A Discussion on The Misinformation and “Selling By Fear” Tactics of Some SB-326 Inspection Companies

The SB-326 Balcony Bill is ripe for scammers and less than ethical people to take advantage of. A “Sell By Fear” sales tactic has emerged and Boards and their managers may succumb to the pressure.

There is a lot of misinformation being spread about regarding the SB-326 Balcony Bill.

As an independent balcony inspection firm, we have seen this everywhere we go. I see misinformation being spread mostly by inspectors who are not independent inspection firms. Instead these inspectors have a primary interest in feeding their main business of construction repairs and waterproofing work. They operate by doing inspections at cut rate prices, luring in their mark by saying the inspection is free if we do the repairs, or “mail in rebate” or some other tactic to get you to bite. Then they fear sell you a job you don’t need. “All the decks need to be replaced because they don’t meet current code” and if you balk they say they will need to report this to the law and that the fines are tremendous for not complying. Fear sells. For enormous profits for the company and enormous commission for the salesman.

William Leys Waterproofing Consultants LLC does not have any conflicts of interests; we do not bid for repair work, we have no interest in any construction or waterproofing companies, or in any deck coating materials manufacturer’s or related industries.  We won’t let you get taken to the cleaners. We are your agent. We provide you data and information for a fee that allows you to make good business decisions.

You are quite aware of the bill and its provisions so I won’t go deeply into the bill.  

The bill requires inspections of the EEE’s in condominium complexes with 3 or more units. 

The bill requires inspections of Exterior Elevated Elements more than 6’  off the ground. EEE’s consist of stairs, walkways, landings, decks and balconies and railings that extend past the building line.

In my opinion, if it could even be slightly interpreted that your deck qualifies as an EEE, it must be inspected. My belief is that it’s better to err on the side of caution than defend a lawsuit that asks why you didn’t inspect the decks because somehow it collapsed and someone was injured or killed. 

As an inspector, we follow the balcony bill in defining repairs. SB-326 defines the two types of repairs that may need to be done- Non Emergency repairs and emergency repairs. A clear sign that you may be the victim of a scam is when the inspector tells you that you “Have to fix/replace your decks” without also declaring in his report that the decks are “emergency repairs”. If they do declare them as emergency repairs, then a on site meeting should be arranged so the inspector can show your Board the exact problems he’s found.

An emergency repair is defined as a repair that must be done ASAP because structural elements (framing) have been inspected by a structural engineer, and in his/her opinion presents an immediate danger and may place occupants and the building at risk if the balcony should suddenly fail. This type of repair must be reported to the governing building agency (County or City) over the property. Temporary shoring may need to be employed until permanent repairs can be made and the deck closed to further use until it is fixed and the building permit is signed off by the building official. The Board of Directors must act expeditiously to protect the Associations assets and protect life by proceeding with repairs as as soon as possible.  

Non emergency repairs are the second type of repair. Non-emergency repairs can be made at the discretion of the Board on its own timeline. A non-emergency repair might be replacing drip edge flashings and coatings at the edge that are deteriorating, or patching cracks in the deck coating that are non-structural in nature. 

RESERVES & LIFE SPANS OF COMPONENTS

I was an HOA manager, holding a CAI “Certified Manager of Community Associations” designation while actively managing HOAs. I have a strong understanding of reserve studies and their purpose. 

Reserve studies list the components of a building (common area and exclusive use common area)-roofs, siding, gutters, decks and balconies etc that the Association is obligated to maintain, repair and eventually replace. A reserve study assigns a maintenance schedule for each component and an end of useful life date where the component needs to be replaced. 

Reserve studies are generally considered  to be “educated guestimating” as many different factors can affect a components useful life span. For decks, the average lifespan is 20-30 years for a deck coating system to wear out and need to be replaced. However, I have seen 50 year old deck systems still performing because they have been maintained and repaired and they are mostly out of the elements-sun and rain being their main adversaries. I have also seen deck systems that only lasted 10-12 years when they were expected to last 25 years, but failed due to lack of maintenance and repairs and severe exposure to pedestrian traffic use and weather. 

However, just because a component is at the end of its useful life by the reserve studies estimate,  doesn’t necessarily mean that’s it, it’s over and we need to replace the decks immediately. Rather, WLWC LLC recommends that the prudent approach to take is this; have an expert inspect the component(s) and determine if that component is still functioning as expected. If it is performing as expected, the reserved study should be updated to provide for an inspection of the components at a future date. Perhaps a deck should be reinspected in 2 year cycles.  If it isn’t functioning as expected, can it be repaired to restore its functionality? If the answer is yes, the solution is to fix it and continue inspections periodically. 

In the meantime, the contributions to the reserve account continue to accumulate and when the deck does finally reach the end of it’s useful life, there should be excess money for the repairs.    

Conclusion- There are a lot of choices out there in the balcony inspection industry and some of them aren’t as a good a choice as others. At William Leys Waterproofing Consultants LLC, we know that we are only going to succeed by grounding our principles into just a few words-no conflicts of interest. That’s it.

We don’t have any ownership in any waterproofing companies, or a construction company, no interest in any materials we may specify, nothing. We make recommendations on products and company’s based on our experience in the industry and because we are not going to compromise when it comes to SB-326 and it’s importance and the gravity of why this bill exists.

If that works for you, contact us today. We specialize in working with smaller HOA’s for an affordable price.